From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cepin v. Hernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 23, 1997
245 A.D.2d 206 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 23, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.).


The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's motion to change venue from New York to Orleans County in light of the fact that the plaintiff and one of the defendants reside in New York County and, furthermore, that the majority of the non-party witnesses, including two eyewitnesses and several physicians who treated plaintiff in New York County and who reside in or near that county, would be inconvenienced by having to travel to a distant county ( Schneeweiss v. Pelkey, 138 A.D.2d 271).

We have considered appellant's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Milonas, Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Cepin v. Hernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 23, 1997
245 A.D.2d 206 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Cepin v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:DULCE CEPIN, Respondent, v. JUAN C. HERNANDEZ et al., Respondents, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 206 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
666 N.Y.S.2d 620