From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cepero v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 6, 1987
513 So. 2d 735 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 85-844.

October 6, 1987.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Steven D. Robinson, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Karen M. Gottlieb, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Kaplan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and FERGUSON, JJ.


A substantial violation of probation by the appellant on grounds of (1) possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and (2) possession of a firearm without the probation officer's permission is supported by the evidence. It is agreed, however, that other grounds stated in the written order revoking probation were not proved or were dismissed by the court in oral pronouncement after hearing the evidence.

We remand to the trial court with directions to strike from the probation revocation order those parts which state that the appellant committed the violations which were not proven by the State. Underwood v. State, 455 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Otherwise the judgment and thirty-month sentence imposed for probation violation are

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Cepero v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 6, 1987
513 So. 2d 735 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Cepero v. State

Case Details

Full title:OMAR CEPERO, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 6, 1987

Citations

513 So. 2d 735 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Pope v. State

However, we remand to the trial court with directions to strike from the revocation order that portion…