From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cepeda v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 6, 2020
18 CIVIL 7304 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2020)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 7304 (LGS)

01-06-2020

GUILLERMO CEPEDA, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons set forth in the Court's Order dated January 6, 2020, Magistrate Judge Cave's Report and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety as the opinion of the Court; for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation , Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied; the decision by the Commissioner denying Plaintiff's application for Supplemental Security Income benefits under the Social Security Act is vacated and the case is remanded to the SSA for further proceedings; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

January 6, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Cepeda v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 6, 2020
18 CIVIL 7304 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Cepeda v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:GUILLERMO CEPEDA, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jan 6, 2020

Citations

18 CIVIL 7304 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2020)