From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Century Ins. Co, New York v. Fillmore

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 4, 1975
306 So. 2d 548 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

No. 74-784.

December 10, 1974. Rehearing Denied February 4, 1975.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Boyce F. Ezell, Jr., J.

Preddy, Haddad, Kutner Hardy and Stephen T. Brown, Miami, for appellants.

Podhurst, Orseck Parks, George P. Telepas, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ., and GREEN, ROBERT A., Jr., Associate Judge.


The appellant, defendant below, seeks interlocutory review of a partial summary judgment for the appellees as to liability under a no fault automobile insurance policy.

The appellee, Cheryl Fillmore, a five-year old child, sustained certain personal injuries when she was struck by a commercial vehicle while she was a pedestrian. At the time of the accident she resided in a household with her mother and grandmother. Her grandmother had a no fault automobile insurance policy issued by the appellant, which provided for personal injury protection covering injuries sustained by an insured when struck by a motor vehicle. A claim was filed for Cheryl Fillmore's injuries, which the appellant denied claiming a commercial tow truck was not a motor vehicle. As a result, the appellees filed the instant declaratory judgment action. Appellant defended, alleging no coverage. The parties stipulated as to the basic facts and the appellees moved for a summary judgment as to liability. After hearing on the motion, the trial court entered the partial summary judgment appealed herein. We affirm.

The issue turns on the definition of "motor vehicle" in § 627.732(1), Fla. Stat. The trial judge correctly held the vehicle involved was within the definition. See: DeThorne v. Beck, Fla.App. 1973, 280 So.2d 448.

In a pedestrian case, such as this, where the action is against the plaintiff-appellee's insurance carrier for personal injury protection benefits, such an interpretation is the only reasonable one. For purposes of being entitled to these benefits, subject to the carrier's right to claim against the third party tortfeasor for indemnification, it cannot matter whether the tow truck is a "commercial vehicle".

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Century Ins. Co, New York v. Fillmore

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 4, 1975
306 So. 2d 548 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Century Ins. Co, New York v. Fillmore

Case Details

Full title:CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLANTS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 4, 1975

Citations

306 So. 2d 548 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Citing Cases

Heredia v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Cf. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Butler, 340 So.2d 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). But see Century Insurance…

Camacho v. Allstate Insurance Company

Regardless of the plaintiff's contentions to the contrary, the legislature has provided that only injuries…