From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Centre Great Neck Co. v. Penn Encore, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1998
255 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 30, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.).


Ordered that the appeal of Penn Encore, Inc., is held in abeyance pending the disposition of the bankruptcy proceedings initiated by it; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from by the appellant Rite Aid Corporation, on the law, with costs, and that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for partial summary judgment for attorney's fees is denied.

The burden of proof was upon the plaintiff to establish the necessity for and the reasonable value of the legal services rendered. The papers submitted in support of the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment failed to include evidence as to the difficulty of the questions involved, the skill required to handle the case, the attorney's experience, ability, and reputation, and the customary fee charged for similar services ( see, Sand v. Lammers, 150 A.D.2d 355).

Absent such proof, the record was insufficient for the court to determine the amount of attorney's fees due the plaintiff based upon a proper consideration of all of the relevant factors ( see, Matter of McGovern v. Koch, 211 A.D.2d 682; Matter of Ury, 108 A.D.2d 816). Accordingly, that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for partial summary judgment for attorney's fees should have been denied.

Rosenblatt, J. P., O'Brien, Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Centre Great Neck Co. v. Penn Encore, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1998
255 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Centre Great Neck Co. v. Penn Encore, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CENTRE GREAT NECK CO., Respondent, v. PENN ENCORE, INC., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 866

Citing Cases

Wilmington Tr. v. 153 Elizabeth St.

"While it is not necessary to conduct a hearing in all circumstances in order to afford due process, the…

U.S. Bank v. Bernstein

In the end "the court must possess sufficient information upon which to make an informed assessment of the…