Summary
holding that when a plaintiff proceeds to trial and obtains a conclusive determination with respect to damages, a future defendant, such as an underinsured motorist insurer, has the option of offensively asserting the doctrine of collateral estoppel to prevent a plaintiff litigating the issue again
Summary of this case from Process Am., Inc. v. Cynergy Holdings, LLC (In re Process Am., Inc.)Opinion
No. 94-1214.
August 10, 1994.
E.D.Pa., Buckwalter, J.
DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS
AFFIRMED.