From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Centex-Rodgers v. Herrera

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 22, 2002
816 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Summary

following Sutton, and noting that disability carrier’s release or waiver of its subrogation rights, pursuant to negotiated settlement, does not destroy character of disability payments

Summary of this case from Domino's Pizza, LLC v. Wiederhold

Opinion

No. 4D01-928.

May 22, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Leonard L. Stafford, J.

Patrick B. Flanagan of Flanagan, Maniotis Berger, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Jane Kreusler-Walsh of Jane Kreusler-Walsh, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Keith A. Schafer of Chikovsky, Ben Schafer, Hollywood, for appellees.


[1-3] We adopt the order of the trial court denying the collateral source set-off which made the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

1. That the jury award of $761,641.09 made the Plaintiff whole;

2. That a common law right of equitable subrogation existed for the disability insurance policy payments made to the Plaintiff, George Herrera;

3. The Plaintiff has settled the common law equitable subrogation lien with the disability carrier and received a negotiated release of the aforesaid lien in exchange for a payment of $1,000.00 from the Plaintiff, George Herrera.

Based upon these findings of fact the Court determines that:

1. Pursuant to F.S. § 768.76 , there existed a common law right of equitable subrogation for the disability insurance payments made to the Plaintiff for his loss of income. Accordingly, the Defendants are not entitled to a collateral source set-off for these payments. Measom v. Rainbow Connection Preschool, Inc., 568 So.2d 123 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

See § 768.76 Fla. Stat. (1999).

2. The disability carrier's release or waiver of its common law right of equitable subrogation, pursuant to a negotiated settlement, does not destroy the character of the disability payments and they were collateral source payments for which a common law right of equitable subrogation existed. Sutton v. Ashcraft, 671 So.2d 301 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

3. Section 768.76 of the Florida Statutes does not imbue a wrongful tortfeasor with the benefit of a Plaintiff's settlement of a third party claim with a negotiated subrogation waiver. Bruner v. Caterpillar, 627 So.2d 46 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

AFFIRMED.

WARNER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Centex-Rodgers v. Herrera

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 22, 2002
816 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

following Sutton, and noting that disability carrier’s release or waiver of its subrogation rights, pursuant to negotiated settlement, does not destroy character of disability payments

Summary of this case from Domino's Pizza, LLC v. Wiederhold
Case details for

Centex-Rodgers v. Herrera

Case Details

Full title:CENTEX-RODGERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A NEVADA CORPORATION AND ARLINGTON…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 22, 2002

Citations

816 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Domino's Pizza, LLC v. Wiederhold

"[I]t is the existence of such rights, not their exercise, which denies a tortfeasor the statutory right to a…