From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cent. Radiology Servs., P.C. v. Mvaic

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts
May 11, 2012
35 Misc. 3d 140 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

No. 2010–2744 Q C.

2012-05-11

CENTRAL RADIOLOGY SERVICES, P.C. as Assignee of Clairmont McKenzie, Respondent, v. MVAIC, Appellant.


Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Genine D. Edwards, J.), entered September 30, 2010, deemed from a judgment of the same court entered October 13, 2010 (see CPLR 5501[c] ). The judgment, entered pursuant to the September 30, 2010 order granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and denying defendant's cross motion for summary judgment, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $879.73.
Present: PESCE, P.J., RIOS and ALIOTTA, JJ.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, without costs, the order entered September 30, 2010 is vacated, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied and defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (sued herein as MVAIC) appeals from an order of the Civil Court entered September 30, 2010 which granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and denied defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. A judgment was subsequently entered, from which the appeal is deemed to have been taken ( seeCPLR 5501[c] ).

Since MVAIC established that there had been no timely filing of a notice of claim and that leave had not been sought to file a late notice of claim ( seeInsurance Law § 5208[a], [c] ), plaintiff's assignor is not a covered person ( seeInsurance Law § 5221[b][2] ), and, thus, a condition precedent to plaintiff's right to apply for payment of no-fault benefits from MVAIC had not been satisfied ( M.N.M. Med. Health Care, P.C. v. MVAIC, 22 Misc.3d 128 [A], 2009 N.Y. Slip Op 50041[U] [App Term, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2009]; Bell Air Med. Supply, LLC v. MVAIC, 16 Misc.3d 135[A], 2007 N.Y. Slip Op 51607[U] [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2007]; Ocean Diagnostic Imaging v. Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 8 Misc.3d 137[A], 2005 N.Y. Slip Op 51271[U] [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2005] ).

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed, the order entered September 30, 2010 is vacated, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied and defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

PESCE, P.J., RIOS and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cent. Radiology Servs., P.C. v. Mvaic

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts
May 11, 2012
35 Misc. 3d 140 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Cent. Radiology Servs., P.C. v. Mvaic

Case Details

Full title:CENTRAL RADIOLOGY SERVICES, P.C. as Assignee of Clairmont McKenzie…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts

Date published: May 11, 2012

Citations

35 Misc. 3d 140 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 50875
953 N.Y.S.2d 548