From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Censke v. Dep't of Justice

Supreme Court of the United States
Apr 28, 2008
553 U.S. 1016 (2008)

Opinion

No. 07–10097.

2008-04-28

Thomas Andrew CENSKE, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al.


Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam). Justice STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S.Ct. 397 and cases cited therein.


Summaries of

Censke v. Dep't of Justice

Supreme Court of the United States
Apr 28, 2008
553 U.S. 1016 (2008)
Case details for

Censke v. Dep't of Justice

Case Details

Full title:Thomas Andrew CENSKE, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Apr 28, 2008

Citations

553 U.S. 1016 (2008)
128 S. Ct. 2097
170 L. Ed. 2d 815
76 U.S.L.W. 3582

Citing Cases

Censke v. United States

In 2008, the Court found that Mr. Censke had repeatedly abused the Court's process, and the Clerk was…