From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cena v. Yellow Med. Cnty. Sheriff

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Aug 18, 2021
21-cv-1500 (WMW/BRT) (D. Minn. Aug. 18, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-1500 (WMW/BRT)

08-18-2021

Arturo Cena, Plaintiff, v. Yellow Medicine County Sheriff et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge

When commencing this action, Plaintiff Arturo Cena neither paid the filing fee for this matter, see 28 U.S.C. § 1914, nor applied to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), see 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Clerk of Court warned Cena in a June 25, 2021 letter that his failure to either pay the filing fee or apply for IFP status could result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. To date, Cena has not paid the required filing fee, applied for IFP status or otherwise communicated with the Court about this case. Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Henderson v. Renaissance Grand Hotel, 267 Fed. App'x 496, 497 (8th Cir. 2008) (per curiam). Based on the foregoing analysis and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Cena v. Yellow Med. Cnty. Sheriff

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Aug 18, 2021
21-cv-1500 (WMW/BRT) (D. Minn. Aug. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Cena v. Yellow Med. Cnty. Sheriff

Case Details

Full title:Arturo Cena, Plaintiff, v. Yellow Medicine County Sheriff et al.…

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Aug 18, 2021

Citations

21-cv-1500 (WMW/BRT) (D. Minn. Aug. 18, 2021)