From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cellini v. Needleman et al

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 26, 1966
218 A.2d 839 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1966)

Summary

In Cellini v. Needleman, 207 Pa. Super. 762, 218 A.2d 839 (1966), the appeal was made without payment of the record costs, but the plaintiff waited until after trial and verdict and the grant of a new trial before filing the motion to quash.

Summary of this case from Elliott et al. v. Lenzi

Opinion

March 23, 1966.

April 26, 1966.

Appeal, No. 121, Oct. T., 1966, from judgment of County Court of Philadelphia, March T., 1963, No. 5810E. Trespass for personal injuries and property damage. Argued March 23, 1966.

Gerald J. Cohen, for appellants; Irvin Siegel, for appellee.


Judgment affirmed.

ERVIN, P.J., and WRIGHT, J., dissented.


Summaries of

Cellini v. Needleman et al

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 26, 1966
218 A.2d 839 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1966)

In Cellini v. Needleman, 207 Pa. Super. 762, 218 A.2d 839 (1966), the appeal was made without payment of the record costs, but the plaintiff waited until after trial and verdict and the grant of a new trial before filing the motion to quash.

Summary of this case from Elliott et al. v. Lenzi
Case details for

Cellini v. Needleman et al

Case Details

Full title:Cellini v. Needleman et al., Appellants

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 26, 1966

Citations

218 A.2d 839 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1966)
207 Pa. Super. 762

Citing Cases

Elliott et al. v. Lenzi

Ever since Budde v. Sandler, 204 Pa. Super. 36, 201 A.2d 247 (1964), we have had numerous cases involving the…

Fitzgerald v. Chapman

In my opinion the appellant waived any objection he may have had to the appeal from the arbitrators' award,…