From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Celauro v. Celauro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 27, 2001
286 A.D.2d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted May 29, 2001.

August 27, 2001.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), entered June 20, 2000, which denied his motion to resettle a judgment of the same court, dated May 10, 2000.

Michael N. Klar, Garden City, N.Y., for appellant.

Scheichet Davis, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Stacia A. Seigerman and David I. Scheichet of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, LEO F. McGINITY, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

No appeal lies from an order denying a motion for resettlement of the decretal paragraphs of a judgment (see, Schanback v. Schanback, 159 A.D.2d 498, 500; Blaustein v. Blaustein, 145 A.D.2d 591; Blume v. Blume, 124 A.D.2d 771).

SANTUCCI, J.P., KRAUSMAN, McGINITY and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Celauro v. Celauro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 27, 2001
286 A.D.2d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Celauro v. Celauro

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN CELAURO, appellant, v. SUSAN CELAURO, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 27, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
729 N.Y.S.2d 647

Citing Cases

Vogelgesang v. Vogelgesang

No appeal lies from an order denying a motion for resettlement of the decretal paragraphs of a judgment (…

Markowitz v. Markowitz

ORDERED that the amended judgment of divorce is modified, on the law, by (1) deleting the provision thereof…