From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ceja-Corona v. CVS Pharmacy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2013
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01703-AWI-SAB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01703-AWI-SAB

02-11-2013

LETICIA CEJA-CORONA, Plaintiff, v. CVS PHARMACY, Defendant.


ORDER VACATING HEARING SET FOR

FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Plaintiff filed a motion to remand this action on December 4, 2012. During the January 25, 2013 hearing on the motion, the parties were ordered to file supplemental briefing and a hearing was set for February 13, 2013. The Court, having reviewed the record, finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument, and the motion to remand is taken under submission. See Local Rule 230(g). Accordingly, the previously scheduled hearing set on February 13, 2012, is HEREBY VACATED and the parties will not be required to appear at that time. IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Ceja-Corona v. CVS Pharmacy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2013
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01703-AWI-SAB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Ceja-Corona v. CVS Pharmacy

Case Details

Full title:LETICIA CEJA-CORONA, Plaintiff, v. CVS PHARMACY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 11, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01703-AWI-SAB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)