From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cedillo v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Jan 29, 2009
No. 13-08-00679-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 29, 2009)

Opinion

No. 13-08-00679-CR

Opinion delivered and filed January 29, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

On appeal from the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

Before Justices RODRIGUEZ, GARZA, and VELA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant, Jose David Flores Cedillo, attempted to appeal from a purported order entered by the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County on November 3, 2008. On December 2, 2008, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that there is no final, appealable judgment. The Clerk advised that if the defect was not cured within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. To date, the appellant has failed to file a response as requested by this Court's notice. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to respond to this Court's notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.


Summaries of

Cedillo v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Jan 29, 2009
No. 13-08-00679-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 29, 2009)
Case details for

Cedillo v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSE DAVID FLORES CEDILLO, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Jan 29, 2009

Citations

No. 13-08-00679-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 29, 2009)