From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caver v. E. Gomez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 19, 2015
Case No. 1:11-cv-01025-AWI-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cv-01025-AWI-SKO (PC)

02-19-2015

DENELL CAVER, Plaintiff, v. E. GOMEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO SERVE PLAINTIFF WITH RAND NOTICE WITHIN TEN DAYS AND PROVIDING PLAINTIFF WITH OPPORTUNITY TO FILE AMENDED OPPOSITION (Docs. 76 and 78)

Plaintiff Denell Caver ("Plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on June 20, 2011. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's second amended complaint, filed on April 10, 2012, against Defendants Gomez, Stark, and Garcia ("Defendants") for acting with deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's safety, in violation of the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

On January 23, 2015, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment which included the representation that a Rand notice would be served concurrently with the motion. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 935-36 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 960-61 (9th Cir. 1998). On February 11, 2015, Plaintiff filed an opposition in which he stated he was not served with a Rand notice, and the Court was not able to locate the notice, either. Plaintiff is entitled to service of the notice concurrently with the motion, Woods, 684 F.3d at 938-41; Rand, 154 F.3d at 960-61, and this deficiency entitles him to an opportunity to file an amended opposition, Labatad v. Corrections Corp. of America, 714 F.3d 1155, 1159 (9th Cir. 2013) (per curiam).

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within ten (10) days from the date of service of this order, Defendants shall serve Plaintiff with a Rand notice;

2. Plaintiff may either (1) stand on the opposition he filed on February 11, 2015, or (2) file an amended opposition that is complete within itself; and

Plaintiff is not required to file an amended opposition, but he is entitled to the opportunity to do so and the Court will not consider two separate oppositions. Therefore, if Plaintiff chooses to file an amended opposition, the opposition filed on February 11, 2015, will not be considered and it will be ordered stricken from the record.

3. If Plaintiff elects to file an amended opposition once he receives the Rand notice, he must do so within thirty (30) days from the date of service of the notice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 19 , 2015

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Caver v. E. Gomez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 19, 2015
Case No. 1:11-cv-01025-AWI-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2015)
Case details for

Caver v. E. Gomez

Case Details

Full title:DENELL CAVER, Plaintiff, v. E. GOMEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 19, 2015

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cv-01025-AWI-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2015)