From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cavazos v. Ambriz

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 30, 2023
23-cv-01815-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 30, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-01815-RS (PR)

05-30-2023

ROBERT CAVAZOS, Plaintiff, v. AMBRIZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

RICHARD SEEBORG CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff has not complied with the Clerk's Notice to either pay the $402 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the Court's order, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). His motion to proceed IFP is DENIED as insufficient. (Dkt. No. 2.)

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen the action. Any such motion must (i) have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page, and (ii) be accompanied by full payment for the $402 filing fee or a complete IFP application, which includes the application form itself, a Certificate of Funds signed by an authorized prison officer, and a prison trust account statement showing transactions for the last six months. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions, enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cavazos v. Ambriz

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 30, 2023
23-cv-01815-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Cavazos v. Ambriz

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT CAVAZOS, Plaintiff, v. AMBRIZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 30, 2023

Citations

23-cv-01815-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 30, 2023)