From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Catrett v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 30, 1923
97 So. 124 (Ala. Crim. App. 1923)

Opinion

4 Div. 889.

June 30, 1923.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pike County; Arthur B. Foster, Judge.

William Catrett was convicted of manufacturing whisky, and appeals. Affirmed.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

No brief reached the Reporter.


The only exception reserved on the trial was to the court's ruling in permitting the state's witness Floyd to testify that the beer found at the still was the "kind of beer of which they make rum." This was a fact descriptive of the beer found at the still being operated, and was relevant.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Catrett v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 30, 1923
97 So. 124 (Ala. Crim. App. 1923)
Case details for

Catrett v. State

Case Details

Full title:CATRETT v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jun 30, 1923

Citations

97 So. 124 (Ala. Crim. App. 1923)
19 Ala. App. 311

Citing Cases

Copeland v. State

Witness McCreless, being shown to have had much experience, was amply qualified to testify that the beer…

Bryant v. State

Mancil v. State, 21 Ala. App. 18, 104 So. 880. Furthermore, "inconclusive facts and circumstances tending…