From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cato v. Bell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 25, 2012
No. 2:10-CV-10603 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 25, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:10-CV-10603

07-25-2012

DERRICK CHRISTOPHER CATO, Petitioner, v. THOMAS K. BELL, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the court's "Opinion and Order Denying Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Denying Certificate of Appealability," dated July 25, 2012,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of Respondent Thomas K. Bell and against Petitioner Derrick Christopher Cato. Dated at Detroit, Michigan, this 25th day of July 2012.

DAVID J. WEAVER

CLERK OF THE COURT

_________________________

By: Lisa Wagner, Case Manager

to Judge Robert H. Cleland


Summaries of

Cato v. Bell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 25, 2012
No. 2:10-CV-10603 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Cato v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK CHRISTOPHER CATO, Petitioner, v. THOMAS K. BELL, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 25, 2012

Citations

No. 2:10-CV-10603 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 25, 2012)