From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Catanzaro v. Michigan Dept. of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 20, 2010
No. 08-11173 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 20, 2010)

Opinion

No. 08-11173.

July 20, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff Matthew Catanzaro, a pro se prison inmate, has filed, under Docket #165, a motion to withdraw his motion for a temporary restraining order ("TRO") and preliminary injunction, which was filed under Docket #154. The motion for TRO requested a transfer to a Level I prison facility with a law library. He now states that in fact, he has been transferred to such a facility, rendering his request for a TRO moot.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw [Docket #165] is GRANTED, and his previously filed Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction [Docket #154] is terminated.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Catanzaro v. Michigan Dept. of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 20, 2010
No. 08-11173 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 20, 2010)
Case details for

Catanzaro v. Michigan Dept. of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW CATANZARO Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et.al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jul 20, 2010

Citations

No. 08-11173 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 20, 2010)

Citing Cases

Townsend v. Rhodes

e indifference but the record demonstrates that the inmate received medical attention and is, in essence,…

Plescia v. United States

te indifference but the record demonstrates that the inmate received medical attention and is, in essence,…