From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Catalano v. Catalano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 19, 1991
176 A.D.2d 278 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

September 19, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County.


Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the decision and order of this court in the above-captioned action, dated February 20, 1990, is amended by adding thereto, after the third decretal paragraph thereof, the following: "Ordered that the Clerk of Suffolk County is directed (1) to cancel of record (a) a deed from Frederick P. Catalano to Hilary House Properties, Ltd., dated September 20, 1984, purporting to convey an interest in the subject real property, recorded at liber 9686 of deeds at cp: 326, and (b) a deed from Hilary House Properties, Ltd. to Virginia Guiliano (a/k/a Virginia Catalano), dated April 15, 1985, purporting to convey an interest in the subject real property, recorded at liber 9967 of deeds at cp: 266, and (c) the Notice of Pendency filed by the plaintiff in Action No. 1 against the real property known by street address as 33 Lloyd Lane, Lloyd Harbor, County of Suffolk, State of New York and designated on the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 0403, Section 005.00, Block 03.00, Lot 017.000, and (4) to amend the appropriate indices accordingly; and it is further". Mangano, P.J., Kooper, Eiber and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Catalano v. Catalano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 19, 1991
176 A.D.2d 278 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Catalano v. Catalano

Case Details

Full title:ISABELLA CATALANO, Appellant, v. FREDERICK P. CATALANO et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 19, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 278 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

Summer v. Summer

Supreme Court erred in granting defendant's motion (1) to vacate a prior order requiring defendant to pay…

Skiff-Murray v. Murray

Initially, we agree with plaintiff that there are questions of fact that preclude the grant of summary…