From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castro v. McCarthy & Jennerich

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 25, 2013
Civil Action No. 11-cv-1832 (CCC-JAD) (D.N.J. Jan. 25, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-1832 (CCC-JAD)

01-25-2013

FRANCISCO CASTRO Plaintiff, v. MCCARTHY & JENNERICH, ET AL. Defendants.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Plaintiff Francisco Castro seeking an award of attorney's fees, (Docket Entry No. 19). On January 10, 2013, Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Dickson issued a Report and Recommendation that Plaintiff's motion be granted in part and denied in part. (Docket Entry No. 29). No objections have been filed thereto. The Court has considered the submissions of the parties, and Judge Dickson's Report and Recommendation, and for substantially the same reasons stated therein;

IT IS on this 25th day of January, 2013

ORDERED that this Court adopts Judge Dickson's January 10, 2013 Report and Recommendation that Plaintiff's motion be granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's counsel shall be awarded $5,935.00 in attorney's fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

CLAIRE C. CECCHI, U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Castro v. McCarthy & Jennerich

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 25, 2013
Civil Action No. 11-cv-1832 (CCC-JAD) (D.N.J. Jan. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Castro v. McCarthy & Jennerich

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO CASTRO Plaintiff, v. MCCARTHY & JENNERICH, ET AL. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jan 25, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-1832 (CCC-JAD) (D.N.J. Jan. 25, 2013)

Citing Cases

Elaine v. Credit Control LLC

Rather than examining the evidence in this record to determine a reasonable hourly rate for each attorney,…