From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castillo v. United States Internal Revenue Service

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Aug 27, 2013
1:13-cv-0517 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2013)

Opinion


HEATHER CASTILLO, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. No. 1:13-cv-0517 United States District Court, E.D. California. August 27, 2013

          ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE OF SEPTEMBER 3, 2013 AND TAKING MATTER UNDER SUBMISSION

          ANTHONY ISHII, District Judge.

         Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss. Doc. 12. Plaintiff opposes the motion. Doc. 14. The court has reviewed the papers filed and has determined that the motion is suitable for decision without further oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g).

         Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of September 3, 2013, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of that date, the court will take the matter under submission and will thereafter issue a decision.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Castillo v. United States Internal Revenue Service

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Aug 27, 2013
1:13-cv-0517 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Castillo v. United States Internal Revenue Service

Case Details

Full title:HEATHER CASTILLO, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 27, 2013

Citations

1:13-cv-0517 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2013)