From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castillo v. Naviot Sekhon

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 20, 2024
2:24-cv-00703-PA (BFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-00703-PA (BFM)

07-20-2024

GABRIEL CASTILLO, Plaintiff, v. NAVIOT SEKHON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

PERCY ANDERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, the records herein, and the Interim Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made.

The Report recommends dismissal of Plaintiff's claims against Defendants in their official capacity because the claims are barred by the Eleventh Amendment. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff's Objections to the Report do not warrant a change to the Report's findings or recommendation. Plaintiff objects that Defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity. (ECF No. 17.) This objection is not responsive to the Report, which based its findings on the Eleventh Amendment. Thus, Plaintiff's objection is overruled.

IT IS ORDERED that the Interim Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted;


Summaries of

Castillo v. Naviot Sekhon

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 20, 2024
2:24-cv-00703-PA (BFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Castillo v. Naviot Sekhon

Case Details

Full title:GABRIEL CASTILLO, Plaintiff, v. NAVIOT SEKHON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 20, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-00703-PA (BFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2024)