From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castillo v. Florida Unemp. App. Comm

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 21, 2001
785 So. 2d 552 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 3D00-430.

Opinion filed February 21, 2001.

An Appeal from the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission. Lower Tribunal No. 99-6471.

Scott Trell, for appellant.

John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for appellees.

Before Schwartz, C.J., and Levy and Ramirez, JJ.


We hold that the appellant-employee's actions, which — at worst — amounted to a failure to comply with a superior's directive to produce a written statement about a work-related incident, did not, as a matter of law, constitute disqualifying misconduct. See § 443.036(29), Fla. Stat. (2000); Baca v. Unique Originals, Inc., 724 So.2d 628 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Chery v. Flagship Airlines, Inc., 692 So.2d 213 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Underhill v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., 610 So.2d 48 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), review denied, 624 So.2d 267 (Fla. 1993). Accordingly, the decision below denying unemployment compensation benefits is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to award the appellant the full amount of benefits claimed.


Summaries of

Castillo v. Florida Unemp. App. Comm

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 21, 2001
785 So. 2d 552 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Castillo v. Florida Unemp. App. Comm

Case Details

Full title:DIANA E. CASTILLO, Appellant, v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 21, 2001

Citations

785 So. 2d 552 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Zavala v. Florida Unemp. App. Comm

The decision below denying unemployment compensation benefits is reversed because the conduct complained of…

Riesco v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

The decision below denying unemployment compensation benefits is reversed because the conduct complained of…