From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castiglione v. Kruse

Court of Appeals of New York.
May 5, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3549 (N.Y. 2016)

Opinion

05-05-2016

Marie CASTIGLIONE, et al., Respondents, v. Robert KRUSE, et al., Appellants.

Picciano & Scahill, P.C., Westbury (Andrea E. Ferrucci of counsel), for appellants. Blackstone Law Group LLP, New York City (Justin B. Perri and Alexander J. Urbelis of counsel), and Michael S. Langella, P.C., Hauppauge, for respondents.


Picciano & Scahill, P.C., Westbury (Andrea E. Ferrucci of counsel), for appellants.

Blackstone Law Group LLP, New York City (Justin B. Perri and Alexander J. Urbelis of counsel), and Michael S. Langella, P.C., Hauppauge, for respondents.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 ), order reversed, with costs, plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability denied, and certified question answered in the negative. On this record, triable questions of fact preclude summary judgment in plaintiffs' favor.

Chief Judge DiFIORE and Judges PIGOTT, RIVERA, ABDUS–SALAAM, STEIN, FAHEY and GARCIA concur.


Summaries of

Castiglione v. Kruse

Court of Appeals of New York.
May 5, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3549 (N.Y. 2016)
Case details for

Castiglione v. Kruse

Case Details

Full title:Marie CASTIGLIONE, et al., Respondents, v. Robert KRUSE, et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: May 5, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3549 (N.Y. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3549
32 N.Y.S.3d 579
52 N.E.3d 243

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. City of N.Y.

The dissenters question our assessment of Thoma and assert that our interpretation is "undermined by later…

Thompson v. Cnty. of Nassau

In rendering this recent ruling, the Rodriguez (id.) court addressed prior cases which appeared to hold that…