From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cassidy v. Reichenbach

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
May 7, 2021
Case No. 2D19-4770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. May. 7, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 2D19-4770 Case No. 2D20-985

05-07-2021

JOHN MICHAEL CASSIDY, Appellant, v. JONATHAN LEE REICHENBACH, Appellee.

Mark D. Tinker of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Thomas J. Seider of Brannock Humphries & Berman, Tampa; and Damian Mallard and Alan L. Perez of Mallard Law Firm, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.


NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

CONSOLIDATED

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Maria Ruhl, Judge. Mark D. Tinker of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Thomas J. Seider of Brannock Humphries & Berman, Tampa; and Damian Mallard and Alan L. Perez of Mallard Law Firm, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, LaROSE, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Cassidy v. Reichenbach

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
May 7, 2021
Case No. 2D19-4770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. May. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Cassidy v. Reichenbach

Case Details

Full title:JOHN MICHAEL CASSIDY, Appellant, v. JONATHAN LEE REICHENBACH, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: May 7, 2021

Citations

Case No. 2D19-4770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. May. 7, 2021)