From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cassidy v. Bank of Am.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 19, 2013
Civil Action 2:12-cv-0042 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 19, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:12-cv-0042

04-19-2013

Susan F. Cassidy, Plaintiff v. Bank of America, and Keybank N.A., Defendants


Judge Marbley


Magistrate Judge Abel


Order Regarding Settlement Discussions

On April 18, 2013, counsel for the parties participated in a telephone conference with me regarding settlement negotiations.

The parties have negotiated a settlement in principle, but have been unable to agree to language regarding two provisions. After a frank discussion with me, the parties were unable to reach an agreement on both provisions.

While I continue to believe that there may be a compromise both can live with, the next step is either to continue with the litigation or for a party to file a motion to enforce settlement. Plaintiff's counsel said his client would likely file a motion to enforce the settlement she believes was agreed to. I asked that before she filed the motion, he provide defendants' counsel with a draft of the motion so that Bank of America and Keybank could decide whether there were any additional modifcations of the draft language they could live with.

Mark R. Abel

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Cassidy v. Bank of Am.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 19, 2013
Civil Action 2:12-cv-0042 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Cassidy v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:Susan F. Cassidy, Plaintiff v. Bank of America, and Keybank N.A.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 19, 2013

Citations

Civil Action 2:12-cv-0042 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 19, 2013)