From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cassese v. Citibank N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 25, 2012
CASE NO. 12CV0478-WQH-WMC (S.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 12CV0478-WQH-WMC

04-25-2012

WILLIAM J. CASSESE, Plaintiff, v. CITIBANK N.A. and DOES 1-100, Defendant.


ORDER

HAYES, Judge:

On February 27, 2012, Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a Complaint (ECF No. 1) and a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (ECF No. 2). On March 22, 2012, the Court denied Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (ECF No. 3). The Court stated that "[n]o later than thirty days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall either: (1) pay the requisite $350.00 filing fee; or (2) submit a more detailed and comprehensive motion to proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff fails to submit payment or an amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis the Court will close this case." Id.

To date, Plaintiff has not submitted payment or an amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is instructed to close this case.

_________________

WILLIAM Q. HAYES

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cassese v. Citibank N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 25, 2012
CASE NO. 12CV0478-WQH-WMC (S.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Cassese v. Citibank N.A.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. CASSESE, Plaintiff, v. CITIBANK N.A. and DOES 1-100, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 25, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 12CV0478-WQH-WMC (S.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2012)