From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Casper v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 11, 2013
3:12-CV-0204-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Feb. 11, 2013)

Opinion

3:12-CV-0204-LRH (VPC)

02-11-2013

DAVID CASPER, Plaintiff, v. RENEE BAKER, et al., Defendants.

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:

Before the court is plaintiff's motion to compel discovery (#24). Plaintiff is seeking an order compelling the defendants to answer interrogatories and requests for production of documents. Defendants filed an opposition to the motion (#25) in which they correctly point out that they were granted an extension of time to February 7, 2013 to serve answers to discovery requests (#23). Defendants advise that those discovery responses were served on February 7, 2013 (#25). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to compel discovery (#24) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By: ___________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Casper v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 11, 2013
3:12-CV-0204-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Feb. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Casper v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:DAVID CASPER, Plaintiff, v. RENEE BAKER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 11, 2013

Citations

3:12-CV-0204-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Feb. 11, 2013)