stating that Mathis is not retroactively applicable
Summary of this case from Caudle v. United StatesNo. 17–1251.
06-25-2018
Charles H. CASEY, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
stating that Mathis is not retroactively applicable
Summary of this case from Caudle v. United StatesFull title:Charles H. CASEY, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
Court:Supreme Court of the United States
Date published: Jun 25, 2018
Moore, 871 F.3d at 79 (quoting Evans-García v. United States, 744 F.3d 235, 240 (1st Cir. 2014)). The First…
Walker v. SmithFor more than 25 years, we have repeatedly made clear that application of ACCA involves, and involves only,…