In Hill, 2004 WL 1964898 at *5, 2004 N.C.App. Lexis 1632 at *17, however, this Court addressed plaintiff's argument that under “Rule 41(d), defendants must be taxed with the costs of plaintiff's counterclaim defense."
Summary of this case from Hill v. HillFiled 4 August 1998
In Hill, 2004 WL 1964898 at *5, 2004 N.C.App. Lexis 1632 at *17, however, this Court addressed plaintiff's argument that under “Rule 41(d), defendants must be taxed with the costs of plaintiff's counterclaim defense."
Summary of this case from Hill v. HillFull title:CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS
Court:North Carolina Court of Appeals
Date published: Aug 1, 1998
Barbara declined his request. Plaintiff then brought a suit against Tony and Jewel Hill, which alleged undue…
Hill v. HillBarbara declined his request. Plaintiff then brought a suit against Tony and Jewel Hill, which alleged undue…