From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cary-Lagassey v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Aug 13, 2012
No. 03:11-CV-395-ST (D. Or. Aug. 13, 2012)

Opinion

No. 03:11-CV-395-ST

08-13-2012

LYNN M. CARY-LAGASSEY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.

Lisa R. J. Porter KP Law LLC Attorney for Plaintiff Adrian L. Brown U.S. Attorney's Office Jose R. Hernandez Social Security Administration Richard Rodriguez Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel Attorneys for Defendant


ORDER

Lisa R. J. Porter

KP Law LLC

Attorney for Plaintiff

Adrian L. Brown

U.S. Attorney's Office

Jose R. Hernandez

Social Security Administration

Richard Rodriguez

Social Security Administration

Office of the General Counsel

Attorneys for Defendant HERNANDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation (#27) on July 20, 2012, in which she recommends that this Court reverse and remand the Commissioner's decision for further proceedings. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#27). Accordingly, the Commissioner's final decision is reversed and remanded pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 USC § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Findings and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cary-Lagassey v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Aug 13, 2012
No. 03:11-CV-395-ST (D. Or. Aug. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Cary-Lagassey v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LYNN M. CARY-LAGASSEY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Aug 13, 2012

Citations

No. 03:11-CV-395-ST (D. Or. Aug. 13, 2012)