From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caruso v. Superior Court of Del.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Jun 19, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-277 GMS (D. Del. Jun. 19, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-277 GMS

06-19-2013

MARIE CARUSO, Plaintiff, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

RECOMMENDATION ABSENT TIMELY OBJECTION

This Order is issued upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke issued on April 12, 2013 (D.I. 11), and upon the expiration of the time allowed for objections pursuant to Rule 72 of the Federal Rubs of Civil Procedure with no objection having been received. ,

Accordingly, it is this 19th day of June, 2013, by the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, ORDERED that:

1. Magistrate Judge Burke's Report Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED; and

2. The Motion to Dismiss (D.I. 5) filed by Sandra Autman, Roger Kling, Maureen Frederick, Susan Judge, and the Superior Court of Delaware is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART as therein set forth Magistrate Judge Burke's Report and Recommendation.

______________

CHIEF, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Caruso v. Superior Court of Del.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Jun 19, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-277 GMS (D. Del. Jun. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Caruso v. Superior Court of Del.

Case Details

Full title:MARIE CARUSO, Plaintiff, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Date published: Jun 19, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-277 GMS (D. Del. Jun. 19, 2013)

Citing Cases

Companiony v. Murphy

This Court has consistently held that public employees have a property interest if the employer has set out…