From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cartier-McDonald Construction, Inc. v. Waterview Development, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 4, 2002
833 So. 2d 822 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 4D01-5035.

Opinion filed December 4, 2002. Rehearing Denied January 16, 2003.

Appeal and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John D. Wessel, Judge; L.T. No. CL 99-12026 AE.

Stanley Dale Klett, Jr. of Cohen, Conway, Copeland, Klett, Paiva Merrill, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellants.

Kenneth G. Stevens, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a foreclosure of a mechanic's lien. Waterview Development, Inc. initiated the litigation to foreclose a mechanic's lien against Cartier-McDonald Construction, Inc., and its officer, Pete Cartier, (Cartier collectively) for work done on a sub-contract agreement that Cartier-McDonald made with Waterview to build the shell of a warehouse building. Cartier denied foreclosure and counterclaimed that Waterfront did not complete the work in a timely manner and the construction was poor. After a bench trial, the trial court gave Waterview the mechanic's lien and gave Cartier a set-off for defective work proven at trial. Cartier appeals this final judgment as well as an attorney's fees order. Waterview appeals the trial court's denial of its motion for pre-judgment interest as untimely.

We affirm the final order and attorney's fees order in all aspects without further explanation. However, we reverse the order denying pre-judgment interest. Cartier admitted in the briefs that the motion was not untimely but argued that pre-judgment interest should be denied on the merits. Because the trial court denied the motion as untimely and did not rule on the merits of the motion, we are unable to entertain arguments on the merits. Therefore, we reverse only the order on pre-judgment interest and remand for the trial court to consider the merits of the pre-judgment interest motion.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.

POLEN, C.J., GUNTHER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cartier-McDonald Construction, Inc. v. Waterview Development, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 4, 2002
833 So. 2d 822 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Cartier-McDonald Construction, Inc. v. Waterview Development, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CARTIER-MCDONALD CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida corporation, and PETE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 4, 2002

Citations

833 So. 2d 822 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)