From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Nov 15, 2022
654 S.W.3d 913 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. ED 110057

11-15-2022

Trakesia L. CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Maleaner R. Harvey, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Mo. 63101, for appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Mo. 65102, for respondent.


Maleaner R. Harvey, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Mo. 63101, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Mo. 65102, for respondent.

Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and, Robert M. Clayton III, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Movant, Trakesia L. Carter, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying her Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court's judgment denying Movant's Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).


Summaries of

Carter v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Nov 15, 2022
654 S.W.3d 913 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Carter v. State

Case Details

Full title:Trakesia L. CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Nov 15, 2022

Citations

654 S.W.3d 913 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)