From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. St. Augustine's Univ.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Nov 20, 2018
821 S.E.2d 307 (N.C. Ct. App. 2018)

Summary

vacating and remanding for new findings of fact and conclusions of law because "the trial court based its conclusion that the University acted willfully solely on the jury's awards of punitive damages."

Summary of this case from Driskell v. Summit Contracting Grp., Inc.

Opinion

No. COA17-1008

11-20-2018

Sadie J. CARTER and Helen C. Lytch, Plaintiffs, v. ST. AUGUSTINE’S UNIVERSITY, Defendant.

The Noble Law Firm, PLLC, by Laura L. Noble and Nicholas J. Sanservino, Jr., Chapel Hill, for plaintiffs. The Francis Law Firm, PLLC, by Charles T. Francis, Raleigh, and Ruth Sheehan, for defendant.


NO ERROR IN PART. VACATED. REMANDED IN PART.


Summaries of

Carter v. St. Augustine's Univ.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Nov 20, 2018
821 S.E.2d 307 (N.C. Ct. App. 2018)

vacating and remanding for new findings of fact and conclusions of law because "the trial court based its conclusion that the University acted willfully solely on the jury's awards of punitive damages."

Summary of this case from Driskell v. Summit Contracting Grp., Inc.
Case details for

Carter v. St. Augustine's Univ.

Case Details

Full title:Sadie J. CARTER and Helen C. Lytch, Plaintiffs, v. ST. AUGUSTINE’S…

Court:Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Date published: Nov 20, 2018

Citations

821 S.E.2d 307 (N.C. Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

Driskell v. Summit Contracting Grp., Inc.

The Court finds the jury's award of punitive damages to be persuasive, but not dispositive, on this issue.…