From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Morrison

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 26, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-3000 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 26, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-3000.

February 26, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 2010, upon consideration of Defendants Jose Alvarado and Elda Casillas's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 107), Defendants Ronald Morrison, Manny Arroyo, Bernon Lane, Lauren Troppauer, Lenora King, Junius Russell, Pamela Brown, Nicole Johnson, and Community Education Center, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 108), Plaintiff's Responses filed thereto (Docket Nos. 113, 118), as well as Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike (Docket Nos. 112, 116) and Defendants' Responses thereto (Docket Nos. 115, 119) it is hereby ORDERED that all of Defendants' Motions are GRANTED, and all of Plaintiff's Motions are DENIED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of all Defendants and against Plaintiff.

This case is CLOSED.


Summaries of

Carter v. Morrison

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 26, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-3000 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 26, 2010)
Case details for

Carter v. Morrison

Case Details

Full title:DANA CARTER, Plaintiff, v. RONALD MORRISON, MANNY ARROYO, BERNON LANE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 26, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-3000 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 26, 2010)

Citing Cases

Travelers Casualty v. Morris

The Pennsylvania Commercial Code did not subsume conversion claims where the item converted was not a…

Nakonetschny v. Rezykowski (In re Rezykowski)

Pennsylvania law defines the tort of conversion as “the deprivation of another's right of property, or use or…