From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Mitchell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
Feb 13, 2013
Case No. 1:98-cv-853 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 13, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:98-cv-853

02-13-2013

CEDRIC CARTER, Petitioner, v. BETTY MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent.


District Judge Thomas M. Rose

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


RECOMMITTAL ORDER

This capital habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (Doc. No. 166) to the Magistrate Judge's Post-Remand Report and Recommendations (Doc. No. 163). Respondent is permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 to file a response, but has not yet done so.

The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and Response and making recommendations based on that analysis.

______________

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Carter v. Mitchell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
Feb 13, 2013
Case No. 1:98-cv-853 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Carter v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:CEDRIC CARTER, Petitioner, v. BETTY MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI

Date published: Feb 13, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:98-cv-853 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 13, 2013)