From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. James

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION
Nov 28, 2012
CASE NO. 1:12-00038 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 28, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:12-00038

11-28-2012

ISAIAH CARTER, TDOC #479412, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA JAMES, et al., Defendants.


Chief Judge Haynes


ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Jason Woodall's motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 54) that is unopposed. Defendant Woodall contends, in sum that he is named in his official capacity and thus, the real party is the State of Tennessee that is not a "person" suable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and renders him immune from monetary damages under the Eleventh Amendment. Woodall also cites Plaintiff's failure to allege sufficient facts of his personal involvement in the alleged violation of his constitutional rights.

According to Plaintiff's complaint, Woodall concurred in the warden's response to Plaintiff's grievance of racially disparate treatment. Plaintiff also seeks injunctive relief.

In the Sixth Circuit, a supervisor's concurrence in a resolution of a prisoner's grievance is insufficient to impose Section 1983 liability. Shehee v. Luttrell, 199 F.3d 295, 300 (6th Cir. 1999).

Accordingly, the Defendant Jason Woodall's motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 54) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Jason Woodall are DISMISSED with prejudice.

It is so ORDERED.

________________________

WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR.

Chief District Judge


Summaries of

Carter v. James

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION
Nov 28, 2012
CASE NO. 1:12-00038 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Carter v. James

Case Details

Full title:ISAIAH CARTER, TDOC #479412, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA JAMES, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION

Date published: Nov 28, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:12-00038 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 28, 2012)