Carter v. Dep't of Corrs.

Full title: Curtis Lee Carter, Petitioner, v. Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Jan 12, 2022

No. 1D20-1309 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 12, 2022)

Opinion

1D20-1309

01-12-2022

Curtis Lee Carter, Petitioner, v. Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Curtis Lee Carter, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gecelyne S. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari-Original Jurisdiction.

Curtis Lee Carter, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gecelyne S. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The Court denies the petition for writ of certiorari on the merits. See Topps v. State, 865 So.2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel").

Rowe, C.J., and Osterhaus and Winokur, JJ., concur. 1