From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cartagz, Inc. v. Sanders

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Nov 3, 2015
2:15-cv-1918 MCE AC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2015)

Opinion


CARTAGZ, INC., Plaintiff, v. GREGORY SANDERS, et al., Defendants. No. 2:15-cv-1918 MCE AC United States District Court, E.D. California. November 3, 2015

          ORDER

          ALLISON CLAIRE, District Judge.

         The parties have submitted a Stipulated Protective Order. See ECF No. 7. However, the stipulation makes reference to "Local Rule 26.1, " which does not exist in this court's Local Rules. To avoid confusion, the court will not approve the stipulation, but the parties are free to re-submit it, making reference to the correct Local Rules.

The parties are advised that the link to the court's Local Rules may be found at www.caed.uscourts.gov/caednew/index.cfm/rules/local-rules/.


Summaries of

Cartagz, Inc. v. Sanders

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Nov 3, 2015
2:15-cv-1918 MCE AC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Cartagz, Inc. v. Sanders

Case Details

Full title:CARTAGZ, INC., Plaintiff, v. GREGORY SANDERS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 3, 2015

Citations

2:15-cv-1918 MCE AC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2015)