From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carson v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 2, 1976
51 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

February 2, 1976


Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered May 8, 1974, denying plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction and granting summary judgment to defendants adjudicating that subdivision (e) of section 110 of the New York City Civil Court Act is constitutional, is unanimously modified, on the law, so as to strike the last decretal paragraph dismissing the complaint and as so modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. For the reasons stated by Justice Brust at Special Term, we hold that the statute is not a violation of section 15 of article VI of the New York State Constitution. However, the court having declared the rights of the parties, the complaint should not have been dismissed. (Lanza v Wagner, 11 N.Y.2d 317, 334; Legislative Conference of City Univ. of N.Y. v Board of Higher Educ. of City of N.Y., 38 A.D.2d 524.)

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Murphy, Lupiano, Silverman and Yesawich, JJ. [ 77 Misc.2d 872.]


Summaries of

Carson v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 2, 1976
51 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Carson v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA CARSON et al., Appellants, v. EDWARD R. THOMPSON, Individually and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1976

Citations

51 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

People v. Garcia

The court must then determine the motion on the motion papers, affidavits and other documents submitted by…

Babigan v. Wachtler

Pursuant to CCA 110 (e), as originally enacted, actions and proceedings before the Housing Part were to be…