From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carson v. Hudson

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Feb 24, 2009
CASE NO. 2:07-cv-00375 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 24, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:07-cv-00375.

February 24, 2009


OPINION AND ORDER


On January 5, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed. Although the parties were specifically advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, and petitioner was granted an extension of time to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, see Doc. No. 49, no objections have been filed.

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Carson v. Hudson

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Feb 24, 2009
CASE NO. 2:07-cv-00375 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 24, 2009)
Case details for

Carson v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY CARSON, Petitioner, v. STUART HUDSON, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Feb 24, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 2:07-cv-00375 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 24, 2009)