From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CARSON v. AJN HOLDINGS

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville
Mar 19, 2007
No.: 3:05-CV-294 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 19, 2007)

Opinion

No.: 3:05-CV-294.

March 19, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge C. Clifford Shirley on February 23, 2007 [Doc. 59]. There have been no timely objections to the Report and Recommendation by plaintiff or defendants, and enough time has passed since the filing of the Report and Recommendation to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

After careful review of the matter, the Court is in agreement with Judge Shirley's recommendations, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling. The Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 59] and DENIES plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 56]. Furthermore, because it was incorrectly filed with this Court and not the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, plaintiff's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the court of appeals [Doc. 60] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

CARSON v. AJN HOLDINGS

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville
Mar 19, 2007
No.: 3:05-CV-294 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 19, 2007)
Case details for

CARSON v. AJN HOLDINGS

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN D. CARSON, Plaintiff, v. AJN HOLDINGS and THE PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville

Date published: Mar 19, 2007

Citations

No.: 3:05-CV-294 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 19, 2007)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Rader

Thomas did not comply with these rules. See, e.g., Smith v. School Bd. of Brevard County, 2010 WL 2026071, at…

Reeder v. United States

Reeder did not comply with these rules. See, e.g., Smith v. School Bd. of Brevard County, 2010 WL 2026071, at…