From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carruthers v. Fortner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 19, 2012
No. 3:09-0391 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 19, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:09-0391

01-19-2012

KENNETH A. CARRUTHERS Petitioner, v. JAMES FORTNER, WARDEN Respondent.


Judge Campbell

ORDER

On August 20, 2009, an order (Docket Entry No.28) was entered dismissing the instant § 2254 habeas corpus action.

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals granted the petitioner a Certificate of Appealability on the sole issue of whether he had procedurally defaulted his state court remedies regarding the claim that counsel had been ineffective for failing to investigate and interview witnesses (Docket Entry No.36).

In an order entered on January 19, 2012, the appellate court found that the petitioner had not procedurally defaulted his state court remedies and that this claim should have been addressed on the merits. As a consequence, the case has been remanded for further proceedings.

Accordingly, consistent with the order from the appellate court, the respondent is DIRECTED to file a response within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order on the docket addressing the merits of petitioner's ineffective assistance claim.

It is so ORDERED.

_______________

Todd Campbell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Carruthers v. Fortner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 19, 2012
No. 3:09-0391 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Carruthers v. Fortner

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH A. CARRUTHERS Petitioner, v. JAMES FORTNER, WARDEN Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 19, 2012

Citations

No. 3:09-0391 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 19, 2012)