From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carroll v. Sun Chem. Corp.

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
Dec 12, 2019
No. 02-19-00348-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 12, 2019)

Opinion

No. 02-19-00348-CV

12-12-2019

CHARLOTTE CARROLL AND ROSALAND HENRY, Appellants v. SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO HERITAGE INK AND US INK AND Q'SO, INC., Appellees


On Appeal from the 352nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 352-303167-18 Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On October 23, 2019, and November 18, 2019, we notified appellants that the trial-court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal has informed us that appellants have not arranged to pay for the clerk's record as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). In our notices, we warned that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellants arranged to pay for the clerk's record and provided us with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c), 37.3(b), 44.3.

Because appellants have not made payment arrangements for the clerk's record, we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellants must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam Delivered: December 12, 2019


Summaries of

Carroll v. Sun Chem. Corp.

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
Dec 12, 2019
No. 02-19-00348-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 12, 2019)
Case details for

Carroll v. Sun Chem. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLOTTE CARROLL AND ROSALAND HENRY, Appellants v. SUN CHEMICAL…

Court:Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

Date published: Dec 12, 2019

Citations

No. 02-19-00348-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 12, 2019)