From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carroll v. Holder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 11, 2012
1:09-cv-3093-CL (D. Or. May. 11, 2012)

Opinion

1:09-cv-3093-CL

05-11-2012

SHAWNA CARROLL Plaintiff, v. ERIC HOLDER, JR., UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Defendant.


ORDER

PANNER , District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (#66), and the matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, I review the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983). I conclude the Report is correct.

I adopt Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#66). Defendant's Bill of Costs (#63) is allowed in the amount of $5,242.82.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Carroll v. Holder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 11, 2012
1:09-cv-3093-CL (D. Or. May. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Carroll v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:SHAWNA CARROLL Plaintiff, v. ERIC HOLDER, JR., UNITED STATES ATTORNEY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: May 11, 2012

Citations

1:09-cv-3093-CL (D. Or. May. 11, 2012)