From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carroll v. Hobbs

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Feb 24, 2011
11-85 (Ark. Feb. 24, 2011)

Opinion

11-85

Opinion Delivered February 24, 2011

Appeal from Lonoke Circuit.


PER CURIAM ORDERS

Pro se motion for permission treated as a motion for rule on clerk to file motion to proceed with appeal without a certified record and denied.


Summaries of

Carroll v. Hobbs

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Feb 24, 2011
11-85 (Ark. Feb. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Carroll v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:Conray CARROLL, Appellant v. Ray HOBBS, Director, Appellee

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Feb 24, 2011

Citations

11-85 (Ark. Feb. 24, 2011)