From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carrol v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Greeneville
Aug 24, 2011
NO. 2:10-CV-138 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 24, 2011)

Opinion

NO. 2:10-CV-138.

August 24, 2011


ORDER


This Social Security matter is before the Court to consider the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated July 28, 2011. In that Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, [Doc. 8], be granted insofar as it seeks a remand, and defendant's motion for summary judgment, [Doc. 12], be denied. Neither party has filed objections to this recommendation. Thus, after careful consideration of the record as a whole, including the Administrative Transcript, and after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons set out in that Report and Recommendation which are incorporated by reference herein, it is hereby ORDERED that this Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and APPROVED, [Doc. 14], that the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, [Doc. 8], is GRANTED insofar as it seeks a remand, and that defendant's motion for summary judgment, [Doc. 12], is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to for further adjudication regarding plaintiff's emotional impairments and their effect on his RFC.


Summaries of

Carrol v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Greeneville
Aug 24, 2011
NO. 2:10-CV-138 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Carrol v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JOHN SCOTT CARROLL v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Greeneville

Date published: Aug 24, 2011

Citations

NO. 2:10-CV-138 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 24, 2011)