From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carrizales v. George

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION
Feb 15, 2012
Civil No. 1:11-0024 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 15, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 1:11-0024

02-15-2012

JOHN CARRIZALES, Plaintiff, v. ENOCH GEORGE and FLOYD SEALY, Defendants.


Judge Trauger

ORDER

On January 17, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 69), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss Or, in The Alternative, For Summary Judgement filed by defendant Floyd Sealy (Docket No. 35) and the Motion For Summary Judgment filed by defendant George Enoch (Docket No. 40) are GRANTED, and all claims in this case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Any appeal from this ruling will not be certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) as taken in good faith.

It is so ORDERED.

_______________

ALETA A. TRAUGER

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Carrizales v. George

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION
Feb 15, 2012
Civil No. 1:11-0024 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Carrizales v. George

Case Details

Full title:JOHN CARRIZALES, Plaintiff, v. ENOCH GEORGE and FLOYD SEALY, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION

Date published: Feb 15, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 1:11-0024 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 15, 2012)